Constitution of Urabba Parks/Section 109: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Urabbaparks (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Urabbaparks (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "{{Constitution of Urabba Parks|state=expanded}}" to "") Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[Category:Urabbaparcensian constitutional law| ]] | [[Category:Urabbaparcensian constitutional law| ]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:06, 6 September 2023
Table|Notes|Previous|Next|Download
Chapter 5 >>Part 1 >>Division 2 >>Subdivision B >>Section 109
Inconsistency of laws[edit | edit source]
When the law of a jurisdictional division is inconsistent with law of Urabba Parks, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.
Relevant note from the Explanatory Memorandum[edit | edit source]
273. This section, based on the corresponding section of the Australian Constitution, voids divisional laws insofar as they are inconsistent with the laws of Urabba Parks. The purpose of this section is to clarify the legislative supremacy of Urabba Parks over its jurisdictional divisions.