Constitution of Urabba Parks/Section 109: Difference between revisions

From Urabba Parks Pty Ltd
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "/notes" to "/Notes")
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
= Inconsistency of laws =
= Inconsistency of laws =
When the law of a jurisdictional division is inconsistent with law of Urabba Parks, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.
When the law of a jurisdictional division is inconsistent with law of Urabba Parks, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.
= <span id="EM"></span>Relevant note from the Explanatory Memorandum =
273. This section, based on the corresponding section of the Australian Constitution, voids divisional laws insofar as they are inconsistent with the laws of Urabba&nbsp;Parks.  The purpose of this section is to clarify the legislative supremacy of Urabba&nbsp;Parks over its jurisdictional divisions.






= Relevant note from the Explanatory Memorandum =
273. This section, based on the corresponding section&nbsp;of the Australian Constitution, voids divisional laws insofar as they are inconsistent with the laws of Urabba&nbsp;Parks.  The purpose of this section&nbsp;is to clarify the legislative supremacy of Urabba&nbsp;Parks over its jurisdictional divisions.





Revision as of 17:46, 7 October 2021

Table|Notes|Previous|Next|Download

Inconsistency of laws

When the law of a jurisdictional division is inconsistent with law of Urabba Parks, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.

Relevant note from the Explanatory Memorandum

273. This section, based on the corresponding section of the Australian Constitution, voids divisional laws insofar as they are inconsistent with the laws of Urabba Parks. The purpose of this section is to clarify the legislative supremacy of Urabba Parks over its jurisdictional divisions.